Gasoline rationing, allocation and price controls: analysis of their costs and benefits.
Gasoline rationing, allocation and price are not currently of U.S. energy policy. In the event of a future petroleum supply disruption, the current Administration intends to rely on the market instead of allocation and price controls. However, if an emergency did occur, the U.S. Congress would likely consider a return to controls and rationing. This paper analyzes the costs and benefits of allocation and price controls and concludes that their implementation would result in extraordinary economic costs. The economic waste caused by a gasoline shortage would, under certain assumptions, exceed $50 billion per year. Of the several types of gasoline rationing programs discussed in this paper, none would have any likelihood to reduce this waste to an acceptable level. Because of these findings it is recommended that gasoline rationing, allocation and price controls be avoided in favor of a market oriented emergency energy policy.
Presenta tbls., y gráfs.
Ministerio de Ambiente y Energía. Secretaría de Planificación del Sub-Sector Energía - Centro de Información de Energía y Ambiente, CIENA
Grettel Ruiz Matarrita
Calle 25, Avenidas 8 y 10. San José, Costa Rica
(506)25476900 - 25476239
De lunes a viernes de 8 a.m. a 12m.